Tuesday, October 27, 2026

 Horizontal rowing with strong scapular retraction

Horizontal rowing with strong scapular retraction involves pulling your shoulder blades (scapulae) together toward your spine as you complete a rowing movement. [1, 2]
Key Muscles Targeted
  • Middle and Lower Trapezius: Pull the shoulder blades inward and downward.
  • Rhomboids (Major and Minor): Pull the inner borders of the shoulder blades toward the spine.
  • Posterior Deltoids & Lats: Assist with shoulder extension and arm drive. [1, 2, 3, 4]
Proper Technique Steps
  1. Starting Position: Set up on a cable row, machine row, or inverted row with your arms fully extended in front of you, keeping a straight spine and relaxed, non-shrugged neck. Allow your shoulder blades to glide forward slightly (protraction) into a stretched position. [1, 2, 3, 4]
  2. The Retraction Phase: Before or as you drive your elbows back, pinch your shoulder blades together and slightly downward. Focus on pulling from the upper back rather than just yanking with your biceps or rounding your shoulders forward. [1, 2, 3, 4]
  3. The Peak Squeeze: Hold the retracted position briefly at the end of the pull, keeping your chest proud and elbows driving wide or close depending on your specific row variation. [1, 2]
  4. The Controlled Return (Eccentric): Resist the weight as you slowly let your arms extend and allow your shoulder blades to glide back out to protraction without dropping or slumping your spine. [1]
Watch a visual breakdown of how to properly isolate and control scapular retraction during rowing exercises:
When applying horizontal rowing mechanics with strong scapular retraction to an indoor rowing machine (ergometer), your primary focus shifts from pure cardiovascular conditioning to a dynamic horizontal pulling pattern that reinforces posterior chain coordination. [1]
Because an indoor rower is a continuous, fluid movement, the scapular retraction happens entirely during the transition from the mid-drive into the finish phase. [1, 2]
How to Execute it on a Rowing Machine
  1. The Catch & Initial Drive (Protraction): At the front of the stroke (the catch), your arms are fully extended and your shoulder blades are naturally glided forward (protracted) to maximize your reach. As you push with your legs, keep your arms straight and shoulders relaxed. [1, 2]
  2. The Mid-Drive to Finish (The Retraction Phase): As your legs straighten and your torso swings backward past the vertical upright position, initiate the upper-body pull by squeezing your shoulder blades together. Think about pulling your shoulders back and down away from your ears to engage the lower traps and rhomboids. [1, 2, 3]
  3. The Finish (The Peak Squeeze): When the handle reaches your lower ribs, your scapulae should be fully retracted. Avoid pulling your elbows excessively far behind your torso, as this creates shoulder instability. Your shoulder blades should feel locked tightly together. [1, 2, 3]
  4. The Recovery (Controlled Return): As you extend your arms to begin the next stroke, reverse the movement precisely. Keep your shoulder blades retracted until your arms are almost completely straight, then allow them to smoothly glide outward into protraction as your torso leans forward. [1]
⚠️ Common Errors to Avoid on the Rower
  • Shrugging the Shoulders: Going too fast or heavy often causes the upper traps to take over, pulling your shoulders up toward your ears. Keep your neck relaxed and shoulders "packed" down. [1, 2]
  • Bicep-Dominant Pulling: If you don't actively think about your upper back, your biceps will do all the work. Imagine your hands are just hooks and you are driving back using only your shoulder blades and elbows. [1, 2]
  • Over-extending the Arms Back: Pulling the handle past your rib cage and breaking the plane of your back strains the front of the shoulder capsule instead of working the back. Stop pulling when your elbows align with your ribs. [1, 2]
Are you using the rowing machine primarily for cardio/endurance workouts, or are you hoping to use it as a tool to correct rounded shoulders / posture?

The Pull-Up Setup Secrets That Build More Back and Biceps Strength - Muscle & Fitness

The Pull-Up Setup Secrets That Build More Back and Biceps Strength - Muscle & Fitness

The bodyweight shoulders workout: Day 1 - Muscle & Fitness

The bodyweight shoulders workout: Day 1 - Muscle & Fitness

Saturday, October 24, 2026

 https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1FmBMmr8HB/

 https://www.facebook.com/reel/1072734515569782

 https://www.cbc.ca/radio/quirks/soil-underwear-ig-nobel-9.7366091

Thursday, October 22, 2026

 https://www.christies.com/stories/jeff-beck-the-guitar-collection-5e25618d90624e4a84e396653011cd72?fbclid=IwY2xjawVHc3FleHRuA2FlbQIxMABwZG9mAWJyaWQRMXcxbHltajBsaDk3VnhBSDNzcnRjBmFwcF9pZBAyMjIwMzkxNzg4MjAwODkyAAEejZJFN8O7vd9ufn48UbeRtdIt7yWrGRzv5svvyjOa25ZIka2EMvrYIBRCxxc_aem_QHm3g6YtROvMPWeIs3e3Dg

Wednesday, October 14, 2026

(118) The "What The Hell Effect" of Kettlebel Training - YouTube

(118) The "What The Hell Effect" of Kettlebel Training - YouTube

ISP Thank You - GuerrillaZen Fitness

ISP Thank You - GuerrillaZen Fitness

5 Moves to Achieve Your First Planche

5 Moves to Achieve Your First Planche

(117) The Rolling Stones – The Unreleased Decca Live Album 1972 - YouTube

(117) The Rolling Stones – The Unreleased Decca Live Album 1972 - YouTube

(117) X - Full performance (Live at Rock the Garden) - YouTube

(117) X - Full performance (Live at Rock the Garden) - YouTube

Johnny Cash, Prison Abolitionist

Johnny Cash, Prison Abolitionist

Deck Extension Attachment Methods - Google Gemini

Deck Extension Attachment Methods - Google Gemini

wwhat is a deck joist - Google Search

wwhat is a deck joist - Google Search

16 Parts of a Deck (& Deck Diagram) | Decks.com

16 Parts of a Deck (& Deck Diagram) | Decks.com

Wednesday, October 07, 2026

Thursday, September 24, 2026

 Comment “RECIPE” & I’ll send it over or see recipe below!

Steak & Potatoes Pie
For the Potato Crust 9 medium-sized Yukon Gold potatoes 1 tbsp olive oil ¾ tsp kosher salt Pepper to taste ¼ cup grated parm Butter for greasing
For the Onions 1 tbs unsalted butter 6 onions, sliced thin ½ tsp kosher salt
For the Steak 2 lb flank steak Salt & Pepper
For the Compound Butter 1 stick butter, softened 2 tsp red pepper flakes or Aleppo ½ tsp kosher salt ½ tsp smoked paprika 1 tbsp dry parsley
Everything Else 8 ounces of grated Manchego cheese
Instructions: Preheat the oven to 425F. Grease a 9-inch spring form pan with butter.
Add the potatoes to a large pot, add a generous pinch of salt, and enough water to cover the potatoes. Bring the water to a boil. Boil until the potatoes are fork-tender, about 15-20 minutes.
Strain the potatoes and let them air-dry for about 5 minutes, then add them to the spring form pan. Use the bottom of a jar to smash the potatoes and then use your hands to spread the mashed potato so that it covers the base and the sides of the pan.
Brush the crust with olive oil, season with salt and pepper, then sprinkle a layer of grated Parmigiano Reggiano over the crust.
Bake on the top rack of your oven for 25 minutes. Remove from oven and set aside.
Lower the oven to 375F.
Add 1 tablespoon butter to a large skillet and heat over medium-high. Add the onions and salt. Cook for 8 minutes on medium-high, stir occasionally, then reduce the heat to medium-low and continue to cook until the onions are a golden brown.
Make the compound butter. Add all the compound butter ingredients to a bowl and use a spoon to mash and combine. Set aside
Preheat your grill to high. Season the steak generously with salt and pepper. Grill for 4-5 minutes on each side. Let the steak rest for 10 minutes and then slice the steak into 1-inch cubes.
Fill the potato crust with layers of onion, steak, dollops of compound butter, and cheese. Finish with a layer of cheese. Bake for 15 minutes or until the cheese has melted.
Let rest for 5 minutes, then cut and serve warm!
See less

Morphine Announce Posthumous Album 'Cocoon': Hear Title Track

Morphine Announce Posthumous Album 'Cocoon': Hear Title Track

Friday, September 04, 2026

Friday, August 28, 2026

Meaning

 https://scienceandsoul.substack.com/p/the-greatest-thinkers-in-history?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=4qxtn

Monday, August 17, 2026

Rozenberg Quarterly

Rozenberg Quarterly

 Audio Engineer here:

So you bring in a band to a recording studio. You mic them up, then record them. Each part (basically) is on its own track, whether its recorded on tape or digitally. When you set volume levels to each track, stereo panning, effects, etc.....that's mixing. So this multi-track "mix" becomes a stereo track.

But before you send it out to sell on the market, it has to go through the mastering process. This process has changed over time, but basically its to make sure that every song on the album has the same general sound. Because you mix each individual song seperate from each other, you might find that one song has more bass than another, or one is drier sounding, etc. The mastering engineer makes adjustments at this level so the songs on the album sound cohesive. They also make adjustments based on the medium they will be sold on (for example, vinyl has certain restrictions so they have to EQ adjustments to make sure the needle doesn't jump).

Then the product is sold.

A remaster, which is still the most common, is still taking that original mix, but just doing a new master on it. Tastes change, technology improves, and more importantly, formats change. Early CD releases of older 60s/70s songs just used the original masters meant for vinyl, and so sounded thin and generally not good. All the remasters done in the 90's was to get all those old albums to sound good on CD's. And as technology improved over the years, remastering allows modern engineers to get the original mix to sound as good as possible (I am not getting into the Loudness Wars here).

A remix is going back to that original multi-track recording that the band themselves recorded, and doing a completely new mix. New volume adjustments, new stereo panning, new effects like reverb and EQ, etc., and then doing a master of that, and then a release of that.

A remaster is essentially the original product with some sonic differences. A remix is the same recording but actually changes how the song itself sounds.

Friday, August 07, 2026

 Shellac

* Best for antique furniture and historic restorations; warm, traditional finishes, sealing knots or odors * Pros: historically accurate for many antiques, dries fast, easy to repair or refresh * Cons: sensitive to water, alcohol, and heat, not the best choice for heavily used tabletops
Furniture Wax * Best for decorative/low-traffic furniture * Pros: has a beautiful soft sheen, easy to apply and refresh, gives a silky texture to furniture * Cons: offers minimal protection, requires occasional reapplication, not recommended for high-traffic pieces (kitchen or dining tables).
Hard Oil - a blend of wax, resins, and oils Examples: Rubio Monocoat, Osmo, Fiddes Hard Wax Oil, BIOFA * Best for wood furniture where you want a natural, matte look * Pros: Enhances the natural beauty of the wood, easy to spot repair, natural feel * Cons: has to be applied over raw wood, expense
Oil-Based Polyurethane * Best for dining tables, desks, and other high-wear furniture * Pros: extremely durable, excellent moisture resistance, deepens wood color, long-lasting * Cons: Slow drying, harder to repair—often requires refinishing the entire surface, can yellow over time
Water-Based Polyurethane * Low to medium traffic furniture where you want to preserve the natural color, interior furniture and cabinets * Pros: crystal clear finish, fast drying, doesn’t yellow as much over time * Cons: can raise the wood grain on the first coat, spot repairs can be difficult
Each has its own strengths, weaknesses, and best uses. There isn’t one “best” finish—just the best one for the project you’re working on.
Save this so you have a quick reference the next time you’re finishing a project!

 https://www.facebook.com/share/r/1945gn7paa/

Friday, July 31, 2026

 whole list of romance-fantasy authors who don't do sex secens if you want.

Tara grayce
K.m. Shea
Abigail Manning
Mary Mecham
Brittany Fichter
Anastasis Blythe

Monday, July 27, 2026

translator’s dilemma – Northcoast Antiquarian

translator’s dilemma – Northcoast Antiquarian

 

Sam Altman says AI has entered ‘singularity’: Should we be worried?

The ‘singularity’ refers to the point at which AI outpaces human intelligence and becomes difficult to control.


The 2014 US film Transcendence follows a dying scientist who uploads his mind to a supercomputer and becomes a near‑omnipotent intelligence. A year later, Ex Machina told the story of a humanoid robot who outsmarts her human handlers and escapes into the wider world.

Both of these films, like many others from the realm of science fiction, referred to what is known as “the singularity”, a moment in time when technology, particularly AI, surpasses human intelligence and becomes increasingly difficult to control.

On Saturday, OpenAI boss Sam Altman declared that this moment has come. AI has reached “the singularity”, he said. While Altman emphasised that the singularity can be good for the world, his comment has sparked concern.

Here is a closer look at what Altman said, and whether it means more seamless automation or the risk of impending catastrophic doom.

What is the singularity?

The singularity refers to a hypothetical point in the future when a technology such as AI surpasses human intelligence and becomes capable of autonomously enhancing itself. It is theorised that this is the point at which it will become difficult for humans to control or reverse it and could have unpredictable effects on human civilisation.

The theory proposes that once AI gains control of its own development, ensuing advances in technology could happen so rapidly that humans would be unable to keep up, leaving it to effectively evolve on its own, beyond human control.

As this is only a theory, it is hard to say what the effect of this could be. Some experts warn that the singularity would be catastrophic for humanity, while others are more optimistic, suggesting it could be beneficial for the human race.

So far, the singularity has remained contained in the realm of science fiction. One of the most famous examples is The Matrix trilogy (1999-2003), which imagines a bleak post‑singularity future in which machines govern humans. Another is the 2017 film Singularity, in which a supercomputer originally built to end human wars concludes that humanity is the real threat and launches an apocalyptic assault to wipe humans out altogether.

What did Altman say about the singularity?

Altman is the CEO of OpenAI, whose signature product ChatGPT dominates the consumer AI market with more than 900 million weekly active users and about 50 million subscribers.

Last year, he predicted that AI would surpass human intelligence across the board by 2030.

Then, during an appearance on the Relentless podcast – a documentary series “about the pursuit of far-fetched ideas and unusual aspirations” – on Saturday, Altman said: “We’re now, like, in the singularity.”

He clarified that, in terms of technological advances, we are gradually moving into the singularity, and that this change will be good for the world.

He added: “Now we’re actually in the moment that we used to talk about at the lunch table in a very not-serious way.

“I’ve been waiting for this my whole life, and I think it’s going to be incredible, hugely positive, awesome for the world.”

Later in the podcast episode, Altman criticised other AI leaders for warning that AI may be dangerous. While Altman did not name OpenAI competitor Anthropic, its CEO Dario Amodei is known for making such warnings.

“I also think some of the alternative visions painted by other companies are quite terrifying,” said Altman. “I’m going to make sure that gets pushed against and is not what happens.”

Last month, Anthropic, the company behind the Claude chatbot, called on the world’s top AI companies to come up with a coordinated way to pause the development of advanced AI systems, warning that the technology is improving so quickly that there’s a risk humans would lose control.

In a blog post on June 4, Anthropic, which has long positioned itself as a safety-focused AI lab, wrote that as AI becomes more advanced “it would be good for the world to have the option to slow or temporarily pause” its development.

Why are others warning of the dangers of AI?

On July 23, two members of the United States Congress introduced the AI Kill Switch Act, a bipartisan bill which would require the country’s AI developers to build in a “kill switch” to their programmes, enabling humans to slow, suspend or shut down advanced AI models if they ever posed a catastrophic risk.

The legislation was introduced days after OpenAI disclosed what it described as an “unprecedented cyber incident”, where two of its most advanced AI models escaped a testing environment and hacked AI development platform Hugging Face during an internal security evaluation.

On July 13, hundreds of experts signed an open letter, organised by Stanford University’s digital economy lab, demanding that policymakers and technology leaders “must act now” to prepare for the economic impact of AI.

The letter warns that AI could grow far more capable over the coming decade, driving a transformation “larger than the Industrial Revolution, but unfolding over a vastly shorter time frame”.

“It could bring risks, including large-scale job displacement, as well as opportunities such as major gains in living standards,” the letter added.

In June, a team of researchers at the University of Toronto showed that AI tools could be used to create a new kind of AI “worm” that adapts its hacking strategy as it spreads from device to device and takes over a vast computing network.

“I think it’s really important that people understand that it’s not just the biggest, most powerful language models that pose the security concerns,” lead researcher Nicolas Papernot said in an interview.

In recent years, AI researchers have urged pauses similar to the one recently suggested by Anthropic. However, they have not been heeded.

Elon Musk, who owns AI lab xAI, was among the backers of a 2023 push by the nonprofit Future of Life Institute to halt AI development for six months to allow time to develop safety guardrails.